Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Is Rod Dreher really only Wick Allison's Erin Manning?

That is, in the final analysis only a useful tool kept, like all useful tools, strictly at arm's length only for its utility?

Here's why I ask.

As Jonathan Carpenter had originally mentioned, Dreher was in his old Texas stomping grounds yesterday on various business, attending a secretive TAC meeting, doing a book signing for TLWORL, working his own DIY publicity tour for his Dante book, all of which writing efforts Dreher credits as originally having been birthed at TAC.

Here's the promotion Wick Allison provided Dreher for all those things on his primary D Magazine FrontBurner blog. No, your eyes do not deceive you, there's nothing there. And by all means, if I've foolishly missed something obvious somewhere, call me out on it so I can make amends.

In fact, this is the last I recall of Allison's FrontBurner acknowledging Dreher was even still alive. At least his old newspaper pals celebrate his keen journalistic skills when using his position to expose unsatisfying vendors.

But we also learn that TAC is a sponsor of Dreher's Walker Percy Weekend.

So why is Wick Allison so reticent to directly acknowledge the Allison-Dreher connection on Allison's own home turf? Dreher certainly has a history in Dallas, and the two are far closer than just remote publisher and hired writer. Allison's promoting Dreher's appearance locally in Dallas would certainly raise much broader awareness of Dreher's visit, and thus attendance at Dreher's events, and thus potentially more eyes on Dreher back at TAC in turn. Similarly with Dreher's WPW.

What seems one obvious precipitate from all this to me is that Dreher is far more a liability for Allison if seen to be connected to Allison's primary D Empire (which even boasts its own Academy) than he is an asset for Allison as the little engine that could still keep TAC alive and useful as a tax shelter if nothing else. Manning's unshakeable belief in her Catholic faith may play an analogous role with Dreher.

The other obvious takeaway is that giving Dreher the tax-deductible blog space in TAC to advertise his doings while contributing to Dreher's also tax-deductible WPW is cheaper than raising his salary.

But as much as Dreher does to promote Allison's take home revenue through TAC, one would think that Allison would at least publicly give him the time of day in Dallas rather than treating him ultimately as a potential embarrassment. I'm sure Erin Manning could commiserate.

10 comments:

  1. When Dreher mentioned his trip to Dallas he said "[NFR: I cannot see us moving again, absent a compelling need. The going-home-for-family thing tragically has not worked out, but we're happy where we are. -- RD]: Why do you think this is happening? I think this is because the people of Saint Francisville and Wick have come to the conclusion that Dreher is the Emperor with no clothes. Jonathan Carpenter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With respect to Dreher's family, I suspect it's just visceral: apparently he began as an amateur asshole and just raised it to a professional level as he matured.

      As to Allison, he's only practicing the good habits of any crack dealer: never getting caught with your product on your person.

      Delete
    2. "apparently he began as an amateur asshole and just raised it to a professional level as he matured."

      Rod has a long, long way to go (in light years) to approach the level of asshole-ness reached by Mark Shea, the patron saint of assholes. If Cooperstown had an Asshole Hall Of Fame, Shea would be Babe Ruth, Ty Cobb, Honus Wagner, Christy Mathewson and Walter Johnson combined!

      Delete
  2. I suspect Dreher's reputation in Dallas as an icky social conservative (and Bush-hating "alt-conservative") doesn't mesh well with the target audience of Wick's D magazine, so it's best to keep him compartmentalized in TAC. The overlap of the D and TAC readerships is probably pretty small, so it works better that way.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It must be awful for his family. No conversation with him is private. Stuff they'd long forgotten is brought up ad nauseum on the Internet and in print for everyone, including the neighbors to see. Can you imagine how his mother must feel when she goes to church or the grocery store? Complete strangers know about one of her last private moments with her dying daughter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it's pretty clear that Dreher long ago made his bed as a universal professional victim, so on the home front that means continuously piping up with provocative things that will continually make his family irritated or angry with him, from which he can then continually suffer. In his forthcoming Dante book, he will be doubling down on the home gossip he would otherwise have learned better than to repeat after the local reactions to the Ruthie book.

      The key for Christians and conservatives not doomed to share his DNA is to resist being sucked into his larger cult of passive-aggressive victimization ourselves. What a priest does or doesn't do to a little boy doesn't determine one's faith, one's personal strength of faith determines one's faith. A politician in Washington doesn't determine one's conservatism, one's principles and how one applies them in one's life determines one's conservatism. Unfortunately, bottom feeders like Dreher exist everywhere, sweeping the environment to hoover up weak or damaged individuals with broken or loose faith and principle moorings no matter what they might be.

      Delete
    2. Very well said, Keith.

      -TMFKS

      Delete
    3. Thank you for your kind words, but I would also offer evidence. For example, compare this erupting vision of healthy faith with this very, very different one of which I just spoke.

      Delete
    4. "What a priest does or doesn't do to a little boy doesn't determine one's faith, one's personal strength of faith determines one's faith."

      That depend on what one has faith in. If one has faith in the Triune God as revealed in Scripture, I would agree wholeheartedly. However, if one has faith in an ecclesiastical institution that claims to be the "One True Church" proclaiming "the fullness of the Gospel," and that institution does nothing to discipline the most perverse sexual miscreants, it symbolizes the kind of hypocrisy Jesus so condemned in the Pharisees.

      Too many Catholics refuse to look at one simple fact: Any church (let alone the Catholic one) that behaves in such a fashion not only destroys its moral and spiritual credibility. It offends a holy, righteous God Who does not tolerate His Name being abused.

      In the decade and a half since the clerical sex-abuse crisis broke, I have yet to read any Catholic, regardless of theological perspective, admit that.

      Catholicism as an institution has put itself on the pedestal reserved solely for the Triune God. The laity who really don't know any better have allowed that to happen. The result is the confusion and borderline apostasy we see today.

      BTW, who the blazes is Wick Allison and why should anybody care?

      Delete